click analytics

Ensuring You Are Not Cybersquatting

Monday, April 14th, 2008 by admin

Expanding your domain name portfolio requires knowledge of and attention to cybersquatting laws, which include both the ACPA and the UDRP.  My partner, Enrico Schaefer, said it best in his article: “You Are A Legitimate Domainer If … You Do Not Cybersquat.”  But how do you know if you are cybersquatting?
The ACPA holds a domain name registrant liable for the “bad faith intent to profit from that mark . . .; and registers, traffics in, or uses a domain name that–in the case of a mark that is distinctive at the time of registration of the domain name, is identical or confusingly similar to that mark.”  ICANN’s UDRP Rules essentially tells you are not a cybersquatter if: (1) you do not register a domain name incorporating the trademark of another; (2) you have a legitimate interest in a domain name to which another does not have rights; and (3) you registered and are using the domain name in good faith.  While this is guidance for domain name attorneys, I have compiled some more practical advice to avoid being pegged as the dreaded “cybersquatter.”  Please note that none of this is to be considered legal advice and you should consult with a trademark and domain name attorney before purchasing a domain name.

Consider the possible trademarks encompassed in and rights of others to a domain name prior to purchasing it.  The best way to do this is to remember the word “generic,” and how that classification can save you from a trademark owner who is pursuing your domain down the road.
Properly budget for domain name investigation, purchase, and protection in the same way you would for other valuable property, such as a home.  There are experts available to help, you just need to utilize them.
Quantify the risk of trademark infringement and ACPA lawsuits for the domains in your domain name portfolio.  If you discover high risk domains, you want to be prepared to not only relinquish the domains, but also get a release of all liability for doing so.
Properly respond to threat letters and other inquiries so as to minimize your risk of being subjected to the UDRP or an ACPA lawsuit.  Don’t go at it alone thinking that you understand the intricacies that have caused others to face $100,000 penalties per domain registration.  Your response may be evidence of bad faith that can be used against you under both the ACPA and UDRP.
Properly evaluate the merits of a UDRP or ACPA Complaint.  A domain name and trademark attorney is an absolute must.
These are critical considerations that may not always receive the attention they deserve.  While this list is not exhaustive, it does provide insight into what every domain name owner should be doing, both before and after purchase of a domain name.

A recent article noted that “Simplicity Rules!” when it comes to domain name acquisitions.  While this is partly true, the better way to say it would have been: Simplicity Rules; As Long As You Are Not Cybersquatting.  Domainers willing to pay five and six figures for a single domain name need to ensure their investment is legitimate and protectable.  If successful, a domainer can avoid becoming a cybersquatter.

Source: Brian Hall writing for DomainNews.com - March 20th, 2008

AMD’s CTO Phil Hester resigns, not being replaced?

Monday, April 14th, 2008 by admin

4-11-08-phil-hester.jpg

Man, we know AMD’s had a bit of trouble meeting shipment (and chip performance) expectations lately, but it looks like things are really beginning to come apart at the seams. Merely four days after AMD trimmed its Q1 sales outlook and announced that it would be doing away with 10-percent of its workforce by Q3, the company’s CTO and senior vice president Phil Hester is voluntarily “stepping down.” According to Market Watch, the bigwig is doing so to “pursue other opportunities,” which is about as canned a reason as you can get. Still, the most intriguing part of the whole bit isn’t that Mr. Hester won’t be coming in to work on Monday, but that no replacement will be either. A chipmaker. With no chief technology officer. Sorry, but we aren’t buying that one just yet

source:engadget

Acer not developing game console after all

Sunday, March 23rd, 2008 by admin

Acer, not, developing, game ,console, after, all

Comments made earlier this week from Acer senior VP James Wong had the intarwebz ablaze with hunches that the firm could be entering the console market in one way or another. Now, however, a UK spokesperson has clarified that there “was a major misunderstanding,” and outrightly asserted that the outfit was “not going to release any game console.” Instead, the idea is to “develop a high-end PC targeted at the serious gamer.” So yeah, you can take that Xbox 360 off of eBay — looks like you’ll be needing it for awhile longer.

source:engadget