Men Free Blog

Back in May, we heard overly MTI Micro was struggling provided “an elusive Japanese developer or digicams” to get its Mobion energy cell tech to actual products. Given such a Canon Fuel Cell DSLR patent, it looks as if it’s desire we can no-so elusively safely say at which the camera is making developed. The patent itself is straight up enough: “The up to date invention connected to an electronic resources process undergoing electricity cells, and a good deal more particularly, to a camera process in that energy cells are while to a camera person and a connection device tied to the camera body.” It seems as although the gas cells may gas the overall camera system, not excluding flashes and a greater number of motors, full provided a separate energy management system, type of as if owning your own mini generator. As for when such method should be available, no word.

For every Apple and Nintendo fanboy out there, there is another equally zealous person entertaining a hope against hope that if only these two companies could somehow join forces, the world would be free from war, disease and famine. Apple apparently saw it fit to entertain those fantasies, and has a patent from November 2006 with some interesting Wiimote-esque functionality for what we presume to be the Apple TV. In fact, the patented controller seems to be suspiciously similar to the Wii controller in function, with a similar accelerometer and positioning setup, and Apple clearly states the proposed controller’s relation to gaming, in addition to other functions like zooming in on images. Unfortunately for the dreamers out there, Apple patents out-there stuff all the time that never sees the light of day, and we’re sure Nintendo wouldn’t be all friendly about Apple turning the Apple TV into a Wii-killer. But hey, let’s not let facts get in the way of unadulterated magnificence.

[Thanks, Mark]

Read

Although DISH Network was quick to assure customers that their DVRs would stay functional after losing its patent appeal against TiVo, it looks like the company was a bit quick on the draw. Although the majority of the company’s DVRs have had their software updated to include non-infringing code, the VIP 721, 921, 942 and Homezone 1022 boxes haven’t been updated and installers are being told that they can no longer install or activate them. You’re safe if you’ve already got one up and running, but if you were in the market for a specific box, it’s probably wise to double check those numbers.

[Thanks, Dennis]

Read

Samsung’s been getting pretty creative with cell cameras lately — the Instinct lets you pan around web pages by tracking movement with the camera, for example — but the company’s latest patent application, for a gesture-based phone interface, might be a little less practical. The idea is to use the phone’s camera to track your hand movements, which, from the drawings, should have you looking insane on the subway in no time. Of course, we’ve all been guilty of waving at and even talking to our devices when they’re acting up, so maybe a little feedback wouldn’t be a bad thing — there’s one gesture we’d definitely like to see programmed in there.

source

Dorks we may be, but we’re just not ready for head-mounted displays to hit the mainstream — which is why this patent application for laser-based headgear from Apple makes us cringe just as hard as the MyVu product line. Apple wants to up the nerd factor immeasurably by putting all the image processing and generation hardware in a belt-clipped processing box, which will allow the glasses to shrink down and potentially be indistinguishable from regular glasses. Laser-generated images from the box are then transmitted to wedge optics in the glasses via a fiber optic cable, and hey — you’re watching The Office on your glasses with a processing box clipped to your belt. Can you say “coolest guy in school?” Yeah, didn’t think so — no amount of white plastic and brushed aluminum will ever make this okay. The application was just filed today, so there’s a long way to go before Apple actually gets this patent — here’s hoping we get a similarly long reprieve from ubiquitous head-mounted displays.

source:engadget

It may already be dipping its own toes into the wild new world of solid state hard drives, but Seagate apparently isn’t so keen on others ditching traditional hard drives, and it’s now indicating that it might even sue ‘em if SSD really starts to catch on. That word comes from none other than Seagate CEO Bill Watkins, who told Fortune recently that he’s “convinced” that SSD makers like Samsung and Intel are violating some of Seagate’s patents (as well as Western Digital’s) that deal with the way a “storage device communicates with a computer.” Somewhat curiously though, especially given Seagate’s own plans, Watkins doesn’t see SSD catching on in a big way anytime soon, saying that, “realistically, I just don’t see the flash notebook sell.” As Fortune points out, however, if prices keep dropping at the rate they have been, that “sell” could soon be a whole lot easier to make, which would also make that lawsuit quite a bit more likely.

Hot on the heels of that Apple TV patent which included broadcast viewing functions, we’re getting a peek at a new application which suggests a possible DVR future for the folks from Cupertino. The concept breaks from standard TiVo-like solutions by making extensive use of a handheld component, which would be used to program and control the recordings, and could periodically download batches of shows for iPod-esque portability. On the set-top side, the box would function largely the way most DVRs do now, though Apple seems to be interested in infusing the process with its typical gloss, and part of the application is concerned with the possibility of gesture-based control for the unit (no surprise there). Of course, this isn’t the freshest patent filing in the world, and it’s possible Steve has already moved on to a more intuitive, telepathically controlled system by now.
source:engadget.cdom

You know, we’ll actually be a little sad when the endless legal battle between Nokia and Qualcomm actually comes to an end — but until then, we’re going to revel in all the dirt that comes out of having over a dozen simultaneous lawsuits going worldwide. Nokia now says that it owes Qualcomm nothing for its “early” CDMA patents, because it’s dropped a cool billion dollars into license payments for them over the past 15 years and those deals have expired, so it’s in the clear now. As you might expect, Qualcomm disagrees, and says that if Nokia wants to keep using its tech, it’s got to pay up — that’s on top of the estimated $500 million a year Nokia’s already paying Qualcomm for other patents. Guys, guys, why fight like this? What’s a couple billion a year between friends? Video summary of the entire dispute after the break.

source:engadget.com